The results make it possible to systematize a number of findings in the literature. The predicted effect was clearly demonstrated.
In the second experiment, delay between end of list and recall was varied in order to affect short-term storage and, thereby, the end section of the serial position curve. Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) tested whether the interval between. It could not, therefore, be used to demonstrate independently the predicted differential effect. Such studies reveal the dynamic nature of the serial position effect under different conditions. Repetition, however, did not have any effect that could not be ascribed to presentation rate. Introduction The experiment explored the theory of discovered memory it was initially looked into by. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 distinction between a limited-capacity primary memory and an unlimited-capacity secondary memory was described by James (1890), Miller (1956) about 7 chunks.
Presentation rate has the predicted effect of differentially raising the beginning section of the serial position curve. Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) study was modified. (2001) The Magical Number 4 in Short-term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. In the first experiment, presentation rate and repetition of individual words were varied in order to affect long-term storage and thereby affect the beginning sections of the serial position curve. Experimental operations were applied that were predicted to have a distinct effect on each of these mechanisms, and the changes in the serial position curve were observed. Two experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that the bimodal serial position curve in free recall is produced by output from two storage mechanisms-short-term and long-term.
0 kommentar(er)
